skip to content »

doktorzelen.ru

Who is bokang montjane dating website

who is bokang montjane dating website-21

Throwing on a beret does not a national theme make. Could we be witnessing the start of a generation-long leadup to contention in the hat-hobbling category? Finally, we have a couple of new awards for 2015: There’s a specific form of logical fallacy or cognitive bias that I’ve never seen explicitly listed in collections of such fallacies or biases.

who is bokang montjane dating website-7who is bokang montjane dating website-51who is bokang montjane dating website-61

From this perspective, maybe the thing that’s kept the Apple TV on hold for so long is that they were trying to go down this road, but they kept failing to pull it off (to their standards) in the living room. ” joke/commentary didn’t sit right with me the first time I read it, and after stumbling across it again I now see why.In this hypothetical, we’re talking about a job building houses. Any real carpenter would know the differences between varieties of wood, between the two major types of wood construction, and between the different roles wood can play in a project.Houses are most commonly built using platform framing of stud walls made from spruce, pine, or fir. And he’d definitely know which projects he’d worked on that involved which.If a programmer walked into an interview and gave answers this evasive about how many projects he’d done in Java, he’d be an obvious no-hire.Not having certain experience is one thing; not even knowing what experience you have is another matter entirely.Among other things: I’ve never met anyone in the software industry who is happy with the hiring process, and that includes everyone who’s designed the process.

Nobody seems to have a solution to separating the potential stars from the mehs, and anyone who claims they do either doesn’t have enough perspective to understand the difficulty of the problem (young interviewers who have been trained in one particular hiring style seem to be blessed with the arrogance of blind faith), or they’ve perfected the art of hiring the mediocre (a sufficiently rigorous process can probably rule out almost all the disastrous hires, but will likely also lose a few stars…and it’s finding the stars that is the problem).

There’s always a terrific slight of hand going on when software developers try to draw analogies to other fields.

Blue-collar credentials and being treated like a unique, creative, and highly-paid professional just aren’t compatible.

When Apple made a phone, it turned out it wasn’t really competing in the handset business; it was competing for the next dominant personal computing platform.

The more I think about an Apple car, the more I think that it might be the basis of their future “computing environment”: a space that is completely aware of and responsive to its occupant(s).

I call it the fallacy of causation, or the fallacy of the single cause.